Statistical procedure and the significance of periodicities in double-galaxy redshifts

Abstract

Newman et al. (1989) made four objections to Tifft’s (1980, 1982) analyses of the 72.45 km/s redshift periodicity. In this paper, each of the four objections are shown to be invalid. It is also shown that proper statistical procedures were followed by Tifft both in defining the 72.45 km/s period and in evaluating its significance.

Leave a Comment

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s